先做后看
直接读原文和答案收益很低,先限时做完 5 道题,再回来看解析里的原文定位。
本页为 2025考研英语一 阅读理解 Text 1的完整原文、正确答案与逐题解析(原文约 423 词,共 5 题)。建议先自己作答,再逐题核对解析里的原文定位与干扰项说明。
The grammar school boy from Stratford-upon-Avon has landed a scholarly punch after groundbreaking research showed that Shakespeare does benefit children’s literacy and emotional development. But only if you act him out.
A study found that a “rehearsal room” approach to teaching Shakespeare broadened children’s vocabulary and the complexity of their writing as well as their emotional literacy. “The research shows that the way actors work makes a big difference to the way children use language and also how they think about themselves,” Jacqui O’Hanlon of the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC), which commissioned the study, said.
The randomised control trial involved hundreds of year 5 pupils — aged nine and ten — at 45 state primary schools that had not been “previously exposed to RSC pedagogy.” They were split into target and control groups and asked to write, for example, a message in a bottle as Ferdinand following the shipwreck in The Tempest. The target group were given a 30-minute drama-based activity to accompany the passage.
The peer-reviewed results showed that the target group of pupils drew on a wider vocabulary, used words “classed as more sophisticated or rarer”, and wrote at greater length. They also “appear to be more comfortable writing in role...while [control] pupils imagine how they themselves would react to being shipwrecked, [target] children put themselves in the shoes of a literary character and express that character’s emotion”. The Time to Act study, which is published by the RSC this week, also found that while control pupils relied on “desert island clichés” such as palm trees, target pupils were “more expansive [giving] a broader picture of the sky, the sea and the atmospheric conditions”.
O’Hanlon said she had been most surprised by the “emotional literacy that was evident in the [target] children’s writing” and that they were “more resilient in their writing, more hopeful”. She added “The emotional understanding was very evident and it is probably related to the [rehearsal room process] where you are used to trying to imagine your way through. They were comfortable in describing different emotional states and part of what you do in drama is put yourself in different shoes.” The study showed the importance of embedding arts in education, she said.
But could the results be replicated with any old dramatist? O’Hanlon said more research would be needed but suggested that Shakespeare’s use of 20,000 words, compared with the everyday 2,000 words, gave a “massive expansion of language into children’s lives”, which was combined with children “using their whole bodies to bring words to life”.
21The “rehearsal room” approach requires pupils to ______.
答案C
解析原文开篇即强调“only if you act him out”,后文将“rehearsal room”对应为“drama-based activity”,并写目标组孩子会“put themselves in the shoes of a literary character”。可见该方法核心是让学生扮演莎士比亚剧中角色,故C正确。A“改写台词”、B“观看RSC演出”文中均未要求;D“在RSC艺术家指导下学戏剧”超出原文,试验学校此前并未接触RSC教学法。
22The study divided the pupils into two groups to find whether ______.
答案A
解析试验为随机对照:未接触过RSC教法的五年级学生分为target与control,前者多做三十分钟戏剧活动后再写作。目的是比较教学方式改变后词汇、篇幅与情感表达等学习效果是否提升,故A正确。B将词汇与阅读流畅度挂钩、C谈情感如何理解高深作品、D说活动激发对艺术的兴趣,均非分组对照所检验的问题。
23Control pupils’ reliance on “desert island clichés” shows their ______.
答案A
解析对照班写作依赖“desert island clichés”(如棕榈树),而实验班“more expansive”,能写出天空、海洋与天气等更开阔画面。对比说明对照班描写单薄、套路化,即描写能力弱,故A正确。B“遗漏细节”、C“文风随意”、D“爱用大词”均与“套话、画面窄”不符。
24What can promote children’s emotional literacy according to O’Hanlon?
答案B
解析O’Hanlon指出情感素养与彩排室过程相关:孩子们习惯“imagine your way through”,并“put yourself in different shoes”,能舒适地写出角色的不同情绪。这正是认同并代入文学人物,故B正确。A仅“想象着写”、C从自然取材、D专注现实情境,都不是她强调的机制。
25It can be inferred from the last paragraph that ______.
答案A
解析末段设问效果能否复制到“any old dramatist”,随即说尚需更多研究,但强调莎士比亚约两万词相对日常两千词能给儿童“massive expansion of language”,并与全身表演结合。言下之意该方法与莎翁语言特质最匹配,故可推A。B“语言令学生望而生畏”、C“应纳入其他剧作家”、D“学生不愿学别人”均无依据。
2025 年英语一共 8 个题型,可逐篇对照原文与解析。
把同一题型的历年原文放在一起看,更容易发现命题规律。
直接读原文和答案收益很低,先限时做完 5 道题,再回来看解析里的原文定位。
每道错题标一类原因:词汇没认出、定位错段、长难句读断、逻辑关系看反、粗心。
只把真正卡住理解的词收进生词本,配本页原句回看,别整篇抄词。