先做后看
直接读原文和答案收益很低,先限时做完 5 道题,再回来看解析里的原文定位。
本页为 2021考研英语二 阅读理解 Text 1的完整原文、正确答案与逐题解析(原文约 417 词,共 5 题)。建议先自己作答,再逐题核对解析里的原文定位与干扰项说明。
“Reskilling” is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we plan to have a future where a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind. We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as will the requirements of the jobs that remain. Research by the World Economic Forum finds that on average 42 per cent of the“core skills”within job roles will change by 2022.That is a very short timeline.
The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one. For individual companies, the temptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer in demand and replace them with those whose skills are. That does not always happen. AT&T is often given as the gold standard of a company who decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with a fire-and-hire strategy. Other companies including Amazon and Disney had also pledged to create their own plans.
When the skills mismatch is in the broader economy though, the focus usually turns to government to handle. Efforts in Canada and elsewhere have been arguably languid at best, and have given us a situation where we frequently hear of employers begging for workers, even at times and in regions where unemployment is high. With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February, at 3.5 per cent and 5.5 per cent respectively, unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generational lows and worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to 13.3 per cent and 13.7 per cent, and although many worker shortages had disappeared, not all had done so. In the medical field, to take an obvious example, the pandemic meant that there were still clear shortages of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel.
Of course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in a few weeks, no matter who pays for it. But even if you cannot close that gap, maybe you can close others, and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned. That seems to be the case in Sweden: When forced to furlough 90 per cent of their cabin staff, Scandinavian Airlines decided to start up a short retraining program that reskilled the laid-off workers to support hospital staff. The effort was a collective one and involved other companies as well as a Swedish university.
21Research by the World Economic Forum suggests ______.
答案B
解析原文写明世界经济论坛研究发现岗位“core skills”到2022年平均有42%会改变,且“a very short timeline”,说明技能更新紧迫、对新技能需求迫切。B项与此吻合。A、C文中未提就业总量或机会稳步增长。D把后文“谁为再培训买单”的棘手问题误当成论坛对核心技能本身的争议,论坛结论并非争议。
22AT&T is cited to show ______.
答案A
解析面对技能过时,企业常想解雇再招,但AT&T被当作“gold standard”,选择大规模reskilling而非“fire-and-hire”。举例目的是说明可用再培训替代解雇招聘。A正确。B政府资助、C考核标准、D项目本身特点均非此处用意。
23Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada ______.
答案D
解析技能错配若遍及经济,人们指望政府,而加拿大等地努力“languid at best”,仍出现高失业与企业缺工并存。说明应对不足。D正确。A推高用工成本、B政策反复、C遭遇激烈反对均无依据。
24We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was ______.
答案C
解析第三段先交代疫情下失业率骤升:加拿大、美国失业率从世代低点升至 13.3% 和 13.7%,许多用工短缺已消失但并非全部。紧接的段末用例证点明医疗领域——“there were still clear shortages of doctors, nurses and other medical personnel”,即医护仍然明显短缺,C(a lack of medical workers)正是这句的同义改写。A 政策调整、B 招聘做法改变、D 经济复苏在第三段均未提及。
25Scandinavian Airlines decided to ______.
答案B
解析北欧航空在机组九成停薪后开办短期再培训,使下岗员工转而支援医院,是为下岗者准备其他岗位。B正确。A创造空缺、C提升机上服务、D资助上大学均与“reskilled the laid-off workers to support hospital staff”不符。
2021 年英语二共 8 个题型,可逐篇对照原文与解析。
把同一题型的历年原文放在一起看,更容易发现命题规律。
直接读原文和答案收益很低,先限时做完 5 道题,再回来看解析里的原文定位。
每道错题标一类原因:词汇没认出、定位错段、长难句读断、逻辑关系看反、粗心。
只把真正卡住理解的词收进生词本,配本页原句回看,别整篇抄词。