2023年6月英语四级(第1套 · 含听力)仔细阅读 Passage 1
本页为 2023年6月英语四级(第1套 · 含听力)仔细阅读 Passage 1 的完整原文、正确答案与逐题解析(原文约 350 词,共 5 题)。建议先自己做一遍,再对照解析看定位与同义改写。
原文
The United States is facing a housing crisis: Affordable housing is inadequate, while luxury homes abound (充裕), and homelessness remains a persistent problem. Despite this, popular culture and the housing industry market happiness as living with both more space and more amenities (便利设施). Big houses are advertized as a reward for hard work and diligence, turning housing from a basic necessity into a luxury.
This is reflected in our homes. The average single-family home built in the United States before 1970was less than 1,500 square feet in size. By 2016, the average size of a new, single-family home was 2,422 square feet. What's more, homes built in the 2000s were more likely than earlier models to have more of all types of spaces; bedrooms, bathrooms, living rooms, dining rooms, recreation rooms and garages.
There are consequences of living big. As middle-class houses have grown larger, two things have happened. First, large houses take time to maintain, so cleaners and other low-wage service workers are required to keep these houses in order. Second, once-public spaces, where people from diverse backgrounds used to come together, have increasingly become privatized, leading to a reduction in the number of public facilities available to all, and a reduced quality of life for many. Take swimming pools. While in 1950, only 2,500 U.S. families owned pools, by 1999 this number was 4 million. At the same time, public municipal pools were often closed, leaving low-income people nowhere to swim.
The trend for bigger housing thus poses ethical questions. Should Americans accept a system in which the middle and upper classes enjoy a luxurious lifestyle, using the low-wage labor of others? Are we willing to accept a system in which an increase in amenities purchased by the affluent means a reduction in amenities for the poor?
I believe neither is acceptable. We must change the way we think: living well does not need to mean having more private spaces; instead, it could mean having more public spaces. A better goal than building bigger houses for some is to create more publicly accessible spaces and amenities for all.
答案与逐题解析
答案速查
46What are big houses promoted to be in the United States?
答案B
解析第一段末句说 Big houses are advertized as a reward for hard work a…
47What is one of the consequences of living big?
答案A
解析这是一道细节理解题。第三段在论述 living big 的后果时明确写道:'once-public spaces ...…
48What questions arise from living big?
答案A
解析这是一道细节理解题。根据文章倒数第二段中的'The trend for bigger housing thus pose…
49What kind of social system does the author think is unacceptable?
答案D
解析这是一道细节理解题。根据文章倒数第二段中的'Should Americans accept a system in wh…
50What does the author advocate for people to live well?
答案C
解析这是一道细节理解题。根据文章最后一段中的'A better goal than building bigger hous…
本卷其他题型
同一套卷的其它部分,可逐篇对照练习。
同题型其他场次
内容说明
- 客观题答案来自公开页面采集,未与官方原卷逐题交叉验证,仅作练习参考;如与官方答案不一致以官方为准。
- 完整解析受来源会员限制未采集,复盘页显示的是公开预览片段(可能只有一两句),不代表完整解析。
- 听力字幕仅采集到每段前 3 句公开预览,非完整原文。
- 阅读译文为公开预览片段,非全文。